OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations
AGENCY: Office of Management and Budget
ACTION: Final revision of OMB Circular A-122, "Cost
Principles for Non-Profit Organizations"
SUMMARY: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) revises
OMB Circular A-122 by amending the definition for equipment; requiring the
breakout of indirect costs into two categories (facilities and administration)
for certain non-profit organizations; modifying the multiple allocation basis;
and, clarifying the treatment of certain cost items.
DATES: The revision is effective on June 1, 1998.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Federal agencies should
contact Gilbert Tran, Office of Federal Financial Management, Office of
Management and Budget, (202) 395-3993. Non-Federal organizations should contact
the organization's Federal cognizant agency.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
On October 6, 1995, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued a final
revision to OMB Circular A-122, "Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations,"
in the Federal Register (60 FR 52516) regarding interest allowability.
The revision was made in a continuing effort to increase consistency across
OMB's cost principles circulars A-122, A-21, "Cost Principles for Educational
Institutions," and A-87, "Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian Tribal
Governments." To further the goals of consistency, OMB proposed on the same date
(60 FR 52522) to revise the definition of equipment, to clarify the treatment of
certain types of costs, to modify the multiple allocation base method for
computing indirect cost rate(s), and to place an upper-limit on payments of
administrative expenses for certain non-profit organizations.
With this final revision, Circular A-122 consists of the Circular as issued
in 1980 (45 FR 46022; July 8, 1980), as amended in 1984 (49 FR 18260; April 27,
1984), in 1987 (52 FR 19788; May 27, 1987), in 1995 (60 FR 52516; October 6,
1995), in 1997 (62 FR 45934; August 29, 1997), and in this notice. A
recompilation of the entire Circular A-122, with all its amendments, accompanies
the notice and is available in electronic form on the OMB Home Page at
http://www.whitehouse.gov/OMB.
B. Current Revisions
Circular A-122 is revised in this notice to:
1. Amend the definition of equipment by increasing the capitalization
threshold to the lesser amount used for financial statement purposes or $5,000
(see paragraph 15).
2. Require major non-profit organizations (those receiving more than $10 million in direct Federal funding) to report indirect cost rates by two major component categories: facilities and administration (see paragraph D, Attachment A).
3. Modify the multiple allocation base method (MAB) to be consistent with OMB
Circular A-21 (see paragraph D.3). However, major non-profit organizations are
not required to use the multiple allocation base method. MAB remains one of the
three available methodologies for computing indirect costs.
4. Clarify the treatment of the following cost items to provide consistency
across OMB's cost principles circulars (A-21 and A-87) and the Federal
Acquisition Regulations, where applicable:
OMB is not implementing the proposed restrictions on trustees' travel expenses at non-profit organizations. In line with this decision, and to further consistency between cost circulars, OMB will be amending Circular A-21 to allow trustees' travel expenses.
OMB defers considering an upper-limit on payment of administrative expenses
until better data on indirect costs at non-profit organizations are collected.
C. Comments and Responses
OMB received about 185 comments from non-profit organizations, Federal
agencies, professional organizations and accounting firms. A summary of comments
and OMB's responses are included in this notice. Several comments resulted in
modifications to OMB's original proposal.
The comments and OMB's responses are summarized by section as follow.
Equipment Definition
Comment: Clarification is needed on the treatment of depreciation of those
assets which had costs between the old $500 threshold and the new $5,000.
Response: In order to clarify the accounting for the undepreciated portion of
any equipment costs as a result of a change in capitalization levels, paragraph
15 has been added to explain that the undepreciated amount may be recovered by
continuing to claim otherwise allowable use allowances or depreciation on the
equipment, or by amortizing the amount to be written off over a period of years
as negotiated with the Federal cognizant agency.
Comment: Clarification is needed on whether equipment under the $5,000
threshold, as established by the non-profit organizations' policy, requires
Federal approval prior to acquisition.
Response: Equipment under the $5,000 threshold, as established by the
non-profit organization's policy, can be directly charged to sponsored
agreements (subparagraph 15.b) without prior Federal approval.
Comment: Current subparagraph 13.b requires prior approval for special
purpose equipment, as direct costs, with a unit cost of $1,000 or more. This
requirement is not consistent with the higher threshold of $5,000 allowed in the
proposed revision. This requirement should be revised to be consistent with the
proposed revision.
Response: OMB agrees. The Circular is revised to require prior Federal
approval only for special purpose equipment with a unit cost of $5,000 or more.
Unallowable Cost Items
These ten revised cost items are already unallowable under OMB Circulars
A-21, "Cost Principles for Educational Institutions," and A-87, "Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian Tribal Governments," and/or the Federal Acquisition
Regulations. OMB addressed the issue of trustees' travel in response to the
comments received. For the other items, consistency across Federal cost
regulations was a more significant issue than most of the commenters' concerns.
Comments related to specific cost items are presented below, followed by OMB's
responses.
Advertising and Public Relations Costs
Comment: Current paragraph 37, Public information service costs, should be
combined with the "Advertising" paragraph to be consistent with other OMB cost
principles in Circulars A-21 and A-87.
Response: The commenter is correct. The treatment of public information
service costs is now addressed in revised paragraph 1, Advertising and public
relations costs. Current paragraph 37 is deleted.
Comment: Clarify the types of activities that are allowable as public
relations costs. Public relations costs to carry out certain functions, such as
legitimate program outreach, that are required under sponsored programs and
contracts should be allowable.
Response: The Circular is revised to clarify that certain public relations
costs for the purpose of communicating specific activities related to the
sponsored programs to the public or the press are allowable costs. When they are
necessary for program outreach effort as required by sponsored programs, public
relations costs are allowable. Costs of advertising and public relations
incurred solely to promote the organization are unallowable.
Comment: Clarify whether advertising media costs such as radio and television
are allowable.
Response: As long as the public relations costs are specifically required by
the sponsored programs or are related to the promotion of sponsored programs,
any reasonable advertising media, including magazines, newspapers, radio,
television, direct mail, exhibits, and the like, can be used and its costs are
allowable. See paragraph 1.a.
Comment: Community relation costs should be allowable as part of program
outreach effort for Federal sponsored programs.
Response: Community relations are defined in subparagraph 1.b as "those
activities dedicated to maintain the image of the organization or promoting
understanding and favorable relations with the community or public at large or
any segment of the public." Costs related to community relations are allowable
when the costs are required or necessary to the performance of the sponsored
programs.
Organization-furnished automobiles for personal use
Comment: For security and economic reasons, non-profit organizations often
furnish automobiles and housing for its personnel working on Federal projects
(e.g., overseas projects sponsored by the U.S. Agency for International
Development or the U.S. State Department). These costs should be allowable as
direct costs.
Response: The Circular is revised to allow these costs when they are
necessary to perform the Federal projects, particularly the overseas sponsored
projects with prior approval by the Federal awarding agency. These costs are
allowable only as direct costs to the Federal projects, and not as fringe
benefit or indirect costs.
Comment: The Circular should specify which types of automobiles are allowable
or unallowable (e.g., cars, vans, trucks and buses).
Response: The types of automobiles are irrelevant for the purpose of
determining the allowability of automobile costs. Rather, the determinant
factors should be whether the automobile costs are reasonable and necessary for
the performance of the Federal projects and authorized by the Federal awarding
agency.
Defense and prosecution of criminal and civil proceedings, claims,
appeals and patent infringements
Comment: Current paragraph 35.d, Professional service costs, should be
combined with new paragraph 10.
Response: OMB agrees. Current paragraph 35.d is deleted. Professional service
costs related to defense of antitrust suits, prosecution of claims against the
Federal Government and patent infringement litigation are discussed in new
paragraph 10. Professional service costs incurred for organization and
reorganization are discussed in paragraph 31, Organization costs.
Comment: Clarification is needed as to when legal costs related to claims,
appeals or proceeding become unallowable. Commenters noted that Federal agencies
are inconsistent in the determination of the allowability of legal costs as one
agency would allow legal costs up to the point where the case goes out of the
Federal agency appeal process and to the courts, whereas other agencies would
only allow legal costs through the first phase of appeals within the Federal
agency.
Response: The policy makes unallowable legal and related costs for either
defending against claims made by the Federal Government or prosecuting claims
against the Government. As such, once a final management decision letter is
issued by the agency (for example, a disallowance letter), all legal and related
costs are unallowable from that point forward. Unallowable costs would include
claims and defenses pursued through agencies' formal appeal procedures such as
administrative law judges and agency appeal boards. Note that legal and related
costs may be allowable if the non-profit organization's position is sustained by
the administrative appeal process or an agreement is reached between the
organization and the Federal Government (see subparagraghs 10.b, 10.c, 10.d and
10.e). This revision is consistent with the language contained in OMB Circular
A-21, "Cost Principles for Educational Institutions."
Comment: Some commenters objected to the proposed 80 percent limitation on
reimbursement when the institution is found innocent.
Response: The proposed revision was retained because it provides consistency
with procurement contracts. This limitation is based on the statutory language
of Public Law 100-700, Major Fraud Act of 1988, November 19, 1988 (41 U.S.C.,
256 (k)(5)), which only allows recovery of 80 percent of the legal costs.
Comment: Legal expenses to defend against lawsuits brought by a foreign
government for violation of that country's law should be allowable.
Response: The Circular is revised in subparagraph 10.d to authorize Federal
agencies to allow legal expenses to defend against lawsuits brought by a foreign
government for violation of its law when such costs were necessary or were
direct results of the performance of Federal sponsored programs. The same
authorizations apply for legal costs for defense against lawsuits brought by
state or local governments.
Comment: Legal fees to defend against lawsuits filed by former employees for
termination or by subrecipients should be allowable.
Response: Legal fees incurred in defense of lawsuits not brought by a
Federal, State, local or foreign government, except when the suits are brought
by former employees under Section 2 of the Major Fraud Act of 1988 (Pub. L.
100-700), are allowable.
Housing and living expenses
Comment: For security and economic reasons, non-profit organizations often
furnish automobiles and housing for its personnel working on overseas Federal
projects (e.g., overseas projects sponsored by the U.S. Agency for International
Development). These costs should be allowable as direct costs.
Response: As previously noted (in the discussion of automobiles), the
Circular is revised to allow these costs when they are necessary to perform the
Federal projects and when they are approved by the Federal awarding agency.
These costs are allowable only as direct costs to the Federal projects, and not
as fringe benefit or indirect costs.
Insurance
Comment: General and casualty liability insurance costs for organization's
directors and administrators should be allowable.
Response: General and casualty liability insurance costs for organization's
directors and administrators are allowable, subject to limitations, as described
in subparagraph 22.a.(2). New subparagraph 22.a.(2).f, Insurance against
defects, prohibits the reimbursement of costs against Federally sponsored awards
for product (or services) liability insurance costs.
Comment: Medical liability insurance costs for participants in Federal
training programs should be allowable.
Response: Medical liability insurance costs associated with participants in
Federal training programs are allowable to Federal programs as direct costs.
Comment: Malpractice insurance costs for physicians should be direct charged
to Federal programs while malpractice insurance costs for nurses or laboratory
assistants, which are immaterial in most cases, should be charged as indirect
costs.
Response: Subparagraph B.2 of Attachment A provides that when a direct cost
is of minor amounts, it may be treated as an indirect cost for reasons of
practicality and efficiency, provided that the accounting treatment for such
cost is consistently applied to all final cost objectives. Therefore, when
malpractice insurance costs for nurses or lab technicians are immaterial in
relation to its effect on the overall indirect cost rates of the organization,
they may be treated as indirect costs.
Memberships
Comment: Membership costs in civic and community organizations should be
allowable.
Response: Membership costs are allowable for business and professional
organizations. The Circular is further revised to allow membership costs in
civic and community organizations when associations with these organizations are
essential to the performance of the Federal programs (as an outreach function).
These membership costs must be approved by the Federal cognizant agency.
Comment: Costs of membership in organizations that lobby should be
unallowable.
Response: Paragraph 25 of the Circular disallows lobbying costs. Membership
dues to lobbying organizations are therefore unallowable. The unallowable
portion of membership dues is determined by the percentage of lobbying
activities versus other allowable activities of the lobbying organization.
Selling or Marketing of Goods and Services
Comment: Clarification is needed for what types of activities are considered
to be the selling or marketing of goods and services.
Response: Selling or marketing of goods and services generally include an
organization's efforts to market the organization's products or services such as
through advertising, organizational image enhancement, market planning and
direct selling. Direct selling efforts are those acts or actions used to induce
particular customers to purchase particular products or services of the
organization. The allowability provisions for advertising costs are described in
paragraph 1.
Comment: The guidelines for selling or marketing of goods and services should
be consistent with those in FAR 31.205.38(c)(1).
Response: FAR 31.205.38(c)(1) allows direct selling costs at commercial
contractors if they are reasonable in amount. By contrast to the commercial
contract context, direct selling costs are generally not considered to be
necessary costs for the performance of Federal sponsored programs by non-profit
organizations. In those cases where they are essential for certain Federal
sponsored programs, these costs can be charged as direct costs to the Federal
sponsored programs if they are approved by the Federal awarding agency.
Comment: Given that the Bayh-Dole Act encouraged technology transfer, selling
or marketing costs of goods or services should be allowable costs. At the
minimum, these costs should be allowable as direct costs to the Federal
projects.
Response: The Circular is revised to allow selling or marketing costs as
direct costs to some Federal sponsored programs when approved by the Federal
awarding agency.
Severance Pay
Comment: Early retirement benefits should be allowable costs.
Response: Early retirement benefit costs are allowable costs, subject to
limitations, and are discussed in subparagraph 6.f, Fringe Benefits, along with
other forms of fringe benefits. Paragraph 49, Severance Pay, deals only with
severance policy, i.e., dismissal, and the reimbursement of its costs.
Comment: Guidelines for costs of severance pay to foreign nationals in excess
of customary or prevailing practices should be consistent with section 2151 of
the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994 (FASA).
Response: OMB agrees. The Circular is revised to be consistent with FASA
guidelines for severance pay to foreign nationals in excess of customary or
prevailing practices. As a result, the Federal awarding agency may allow these
costs when they are necessary for the performance of the Federal sponsored
programs.
Trustees' Travel
Comment: Several commenters opposed the proposal to disallow trustees' travel
costs citing the difficulty of retaining or obtaining members to serve
voluntarily on the Board of Trustees (or Directors) of a non-profit
organization, if Board members have to pay for their own travel expenses to
attend Board meetings. The commenters added that since serving on a non-profit
organization's Board is often not as prestigious and desirable as serving on a
University's Board (where trustees' travel costs are unallowable under Circular
A-21), non-reimbursement of the travel costs would inhibit the recruitment of
Board members.
Response: OMB concurs that disallowing the reimbursement of trustees' travel
costs could inhibit the recruitment of qualified Board members (particularly at
smaller non-profit organizations), thereby hampering the operations of a
non-profit organization. OMB also recognizes that trustees' travel costs are
reasonable and necessary business costs. As a result, trustees' travel costs
remain allowable.
Comment: Trustees' travel costs should be allowable if they are reasonable.
Some suggested tests for reasonableness of trustees' travel costs are: limit
number of allowed trips per year, restriction of trips to organization's
principal place of business or reasonable surroundings, distinction between
scheduled Board meetings and emergency Board meetings, and disallowance of
first-class airfare travels.
Response: All costs charged to Federal projects must satisfy a reasonableness
test. Although some of the suggested reasonableness tests appear to be good, OMB
does not believe it is necessary at this time to impose specific restrictions on
trustees' travel expenses. The reasonableness of a particular travel expense
remains at the judgement of Federal negotiators.
Comment: At Head Start organizations, some Trustee members are first sent for
training in the operations of a Head Start program. These travel costs related
to training should be allowable.
Response: Travel costs related to training and education are allowable,
subject to limitations, and are addressed in paragraph 53 of the Circular,
Training and education costs.
Comment: At Head Start organizations, there often are several advisory boards
in addition to the Board of Trustees (or Directors). These advisory boards are
involved in day-to-day operations of the organizations and often incur travel
costs. Are these costs subject to the same restrictions as trustees' travel?
Response: Travel costs for members of advisory groups are allowable, subject
to the limitations in paragraph 55, Travel costs.
Multiple Allocation Basis (MAB)
Comment: The multiple allocation method for calculating indirect costs rates
is much more complicated and burdensome than the simplified method and it will
cost non-profit organizations much more to prepare the indirect cost proposal.
Several commenters recommended the flexibility of using one of the three
different allocation methods as they are currently described in the Circular.
The multiple allocation basis (MAB) should remain an optional allocation
methodology rather than a required methodology for certain organizations.
Response: The use of MAB for major non-profit organizations promotes
consistency in the calculation and the reporting of indirect costs. It would
facilitate the accumulation of indirect cost data by cost components (i.e.,
facilities and administration) and provide comparable rates between major
research non-profit organizations and universities. However, OMB recognizes that
a conversion to MAB may require some substantial changes in the organization's
accounting system and that MAB is not practical for single-function
organizations. Therefore, the Circular continues to allow non-profit
organizations to use any of the current three allocation methodologies.
Comment: Several commenters suggested raising the threshold for the
requirement to $25 million in direct Federal funding. Several commenters also
suggested an exemption from this requirement for single-function organizations
regardless of Federal funding levels.
Response: The Circular is revised to allow the use of the current three
allocation methodologies for all non-profit organizations. For organizations
that receive more than $10 million in direct Federal funding, a breakout of
indirect costs into two components, facilities and administration, is required
regardless of the selected allocation methodology.
Comment: The allocation methodology for general administration under MAB on
the basis of modified total direct costs conflicts with the required methodology
under Cost Accounting Standard (CAS) 410 applicable to contracts using the
salaries and wages basis. One commenter suggested that a fully CAS-covered
non-profit organization be exempted from the MAB requirement.
Response: MAB is not a requirement for non-profit organizations and remains
one of the three available methodologies in the Circular for computing indirect
costs. In addition, CAS-covered non-profit organizations should continue to
follow CAS with respect to the measurement, assignment and allocation of costs.
Comment: The revision should clarify that the modified total direct cost base
should only include the first $25,000 of a subcontract regardless of the period
during which the project is started (consistent with OMB Circular A-21).
Response: The modified total direct cost base, described in subparagraph
D.3.f of the Circular, includes the first $25,000 of each subgrant or
subcontract regardless of the period covered by the subgrant or subcontract.
Subgrant or subcontract costs above $25,000 shall be excluded from the modified
total direct cost base. For example, for a $300,000 subgrant that lasts three
years, only the first $25,000 incurred on the award should be included in the
modified total direct cost base.
Administrative Cap of 26 percent
Comment: Most commenters strongly opposed the 26 percent administrative cap
stating that such limitation on cost reimbursement is arbitrary, capricious, and
unnecessary. Some argued that a cap would be financially disastrous to
non-profit organizations because they receive most of their funding from Federal
sources (unlike universities). A detailed analysis is urged to determine the
average administrative costs applicable to non-profit organizations, if an
administrative cap is to be implemented at non-profit organizations.
Response: Based on the comments against the implementation of an administrative cap at non-profit organizations, OMB defers the consideration of establishing any administrative cap until better data on indirect costs at non-profit organizations can be collected. If OMB believes that an administrative cap should be implemented, it would be proposed in a subsequent notice.
Other
Comment: Attachment C of the Circular should be updated since a few listed organizations no longer exist.
Response: OMB agrees. Attachment C is updated to delete those organizations
that no longer exist or are no longer exempted from OMB Circular A-122.
Franklin D. Raines
Director
A. Attachment A
1. Add subparagraph 3 to paragraph C ("Indirect Costs").
3. Indirect costs shall be classified within two broad categories:
"Facilities" and "Administration." "Facilities" is defined as depreciation and
use allowances on buildings, equipment and capital improvement, interest on debt
associated with certain buildings, equipment and capital improvements, and
operations and maintenance expenses. "Administration" is defined as general
administration and general expenses such as the director's office, accounting,
personnel, library expenses and all other types of expenditures not listed
specifically under one of the subcategories of "Facilities" (including cross
allocations from other pools, where applicable). See indirect cost rate
reporting requirements in subparagraphs D.2.e and D.3.g.
2. Add subparagraph 2.e to paragraph D.
e. For an organization that receives more than $10 million in Federal funding
of direct costs in a fiscal year, a breakout of the indirect cost component into
two broad categories, Facilities and Administration as defined in subparagraph
C.3, is required. The rate in each case shall be stated as the percentage which
the amount of the particular indirect cost category (i.e., Facilities or
Administration) is of the distribution base identified with that category.
3. Replace subparagraph D.3 with the following:
3. Multiple allocation base method.
a. General. Where an organization's indirect costs benefit its major
functions in varying degrees, indirect costs shall be accumulated into separate
cost groupings, as described in subparagraph b. Each grouping shall then be
allocated individually to benefitting functions by means of a base which best
measures the relative benefits. The default allocation bases by cost pool are
described in subparagraph c.
b. Identification of indirect costs. Cost groupings shall be established so
as to permit the allocation of each grouping on the basis of benefits provided
to the major functions. Each grouping shall constitute a pool of expenses that
are of like character in terms of functions they benefit and in terms of the
allocation base which best measures the relative benefits provided to each
function. The groupings are classified within the two broad categories:
"Facilities" and "Administration," as described in subparagraph C.3. The
indirect cost pools are defined as follows:
(1) Depreciation and use allowances. The expenses under this heading are the
portion of the costs of the organization's buildings, capital improvements to
land and buildings, and equipment which are computed in accordance with
paragraph 11 of Attachment B ("Depreciation and use allowances").
(2) Interest. Interest on debt associated with certain buildings, equipment
and capital improvements are computed in accordance with paragraph 23 of
Attachment B ("Interest, fund raising, and investment management costs").
(3) Operation and maintenance expenses. The expenses under this heading are
those that have been incurred for the administration, operation, maintenance,
preservation, and protection of the organization's physical plant. They include
expenses normally incurred for such items as: janitorial and utility services;
repairs and ordinary or normal alterations of buildings, furniture and
equipment; care of grounds; maintenance and operation of buildings and other
plant facilities; security; earthquake and disaster preparedness; environmental
safety; hazardous waste disposal; property, liability and other insurance
relating to property; space and capital leasing; facility planning and
management; and, central receiving. The operation and maintenance expenses
category shall also include its allocable share of fringe benefit costs,
depreciation and use allowances, and interest costs.
(4) General administration and general expenses. The expenses under this
heading are those that have been incurred for the overall general executive and
administrative offices of the organization and other expenses of a general
nature which do not relate solely to any major function of the organization.
This category shall also include its allocable share of fringe benefit costs,
operation and maintenance expense, depreciation and use allowances, and interest
costs. Examples of this category include central offices, such as the director's
office, the office of finance, business services, budget and planning,
personnel, safety and risk management, general counsel, management information
systems, and library costs.
In developing this cost pool, special care should be exercised to ensure that costs incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances are treated consistently as either direct or indirect costs. For example, salaries of technical staff, project supplies, project publication, telephone toll charges, computer costs, travel costs, and specialized services costs shall be treated as direct costs wherever identifiable to a particular program. The salaries and wages of administrative and pooled clerical staff should normally be treated as indirect costs. Direct charging of these costs may be appropriate where a major project or activity explicitly requires and budgets for administrative or clerical services and other individuals involved can be identified with the program or activity. Items such as office supplies, postage, local telephone costs, periodicals and memberships should normally be treated as indirect costs.
c. Allocation bases. Actual conditions shall be taken into account in
selecting the base to be used in allocating the expenses in each grouping to
benefitting functions. The essential consideration in selecting a method or a
base is that it is the one best suited for assigning the pool of costs to cost
objectives in accordance with benefits derived; a traceable cause and effect
relationship; or logic and reason, where neither the cause nor the effect of the
relationship is determinable. When an allocation can be made by assignment of a
cost grouping directly to the function benefited, the allocation shall be made
in that manner. When the expenses in a cost grouping are more general in nature,
the allocation shall be made through the use of a selected base which produces
results that are equitable to both the Federal Government and the organization.
The distribution shall be made in accordance with the bases described herein
unless it can be demonstrated that the use of a different base would result in a
more equitable allocation of the costs, or that a more readily available base
would not increase the costs charged to sponsored awards. The results of special
cost studies (such as an engineering utility study) shall not be used to
determine and allocate the indirect costs to sponsored awards.
(1) Depreciation and use allowances. Depreciation and use allowances expenses
shall be allocated in the following manner:
(a) Depreciation or use allowances on buildings used exclusively in the
conduct of a single function, and on capital improvements and equipment used in
such buildings, shall be assigned to that function.
(b) Depreciation or use allowances on buildings used for more than one
function, and on capital improvements and equipment used in such buildings,
shall be allocated to the individual functions performed in each building on the
basis of usable square feet of space, excluding common areas, such as hallways,
stairwells, and restrooms.
(c) Depreciation or use allowances on buildings, capital improvements and
equipment related space (e.g., individual rooms, and laboratories) used jointly
by more than one function (as determined by the users of the space) shall be
treated as follows. The cost of each jointly used unit of space shall be
allocated to the benefitting functions on the basis of:
(i) the employees and other users on a full-time equivalent (FTE) basis or
salaries and wages of those individual functions benefitting from the use of
that space; or
(ii) organization-wide employee FTEs or salaries and wages applicable to the
benefitting functions of the organization.
(d) Depreciation or use allowances on certain capital improvements to land,
such as paved parking areas, fences, sidewalks, and the like, not included in
the cost of buildings, shall be allocated to user categories on a FTE basis and
distributed to major functions in proportion to the salaries and wages of all
employees applicable to the functions.
(2) Interest. Interest costs shall be allocated in the same manner as the
depreciation or use allowances on the buildings, equipment and capital
equipments to which the interest relates.
(3) Operation and maintenance expenses. Operation and maintenance expenses
shall be allocated in the same manner as the depreciation and use allowances.
(4) General administration and general expenses. General administration and
general expenses shall be allocated to benefitting functions based on modified
total direct costs (MTDC), as described in subparagraph D.3.f. The expenses
included in this category could be grouped first according to major functions of
the organization to which they render services or provide benefits. The
aggregate expenses of each group shall then be allocated to benefitting
functions based on MTDC.
d. Order of distribution.
(1) Indirect cost categories consisting of depreciation and use allowances,
interest, operation and maintenance, and general administration and general
expenses shall be allocated in that order to the remaining indirect cost
categories as well as to the major functions of the organization. Other cost
categories could be allocated in the order determined to be most appropriate by
the organization. When cross allocation of costs is made as provided in
subparagraph (2), this order of allocation does not apply.
(2) Normally, an indirect cost category will be considered closed once it has
been allocated to other cost objectives, and costs shall not be subsequently
allocated to it. However, a cross allocation of costs between two or more
indirect costs categories could be used if such allocation will result in a more
equitable allocation of costs. If a cross allocation is used, an appropriate
modification to the composition of the indirect cost categories is required.
e. Application of indirect cost rate or rates. Except where a special
indirect cost rate(s) is required in accordance with subparagraph D.5, the
separate groupings of indirect costs allocated to each major function shall be
aggregated and treated as a common pool for that function. The costs in the
common pool shall then be distributed to individual awards included in that
function by use of a single indirect cost rate.
f. Distribution basis. Indirect costs shall be distributed to applicable
sponsored awards and other benefitting activities within each major function on
the basis of MTDC. MTDC consists of all salaries and wages, fringe benefits,
materials and supplies, services, travel, and subgrants and subcontracts up to
the first $25,000 of each subgrant or subcontract (regardless of the period
covered by the subgrant or subcontract). Equipment, capital expenditures,
charges for patient care, rental costs and the portion in excess of $25,000
shall be excluded from MTDC. Participant support costs shall generally be
excluded from MTDC. Other items may only be excluded when the Federal cost
cognizant agency determines that an exclusion is necessary to avoid a serious
inequity in the distribution of indirect costs.
g. Individual Rate Components. An indirect cost rate shall be determined for each separate indirect cost pool developed. The rate in each case shall be stated as the percentage which the amount of the particular indirect cost pool is of the distribution base identified with that pool. Each indirect cost rate negotiation or determination agreement shall include development of the rate for each indirect cost pool as well as the overall indirect cost rate. The indirect cost pools shall be classified within two broad categories: "Facilities" and "Administration," as described in subparagraph C.3.
Revise the following cost items in Attachment B to Circular A-122 ("Selected
Items of Cost").
1. Revise the Table of Contents for Attachment B to read:
1. Advertising and public relations costs
2. Alcoholic beverages
3.
Bad debts
4. Bid and proposal costs (reserved)
5. Bonding costs
6.
Communication costs
7. Compensation for personal services
8. Contingency
provisions
9. Contributions
10. Defense and prosecution of criminal and
civil proceedings, claims, appeals and patent infringement
11. Depreciation
and use allowances
12. Donations
13. Employee morale, health, and welfare
costs and credits
14. Entertainment costs
15. Equipment and other capital
expenditures
16. Fines and penalties
17. Fringe benefits
18. Goods or
services for personal use
19. Housing and personal living expenses
20.
Idle facilities and idle capacity
21. Independent research and development
(reserved)
22. Insurance and indemnification
23. Interest, fund raising,
and investment management costs
24. Labor relations costs
25. Lobbying
costs
26. Losses on other awards
27. Maintenance and repair costs
28.
Materials and supplies
29. Meetings and conferences
30. Memberships,
subscriptions, and professional activity costs
31. Organization costs
32.
Overtime, extra-pay shift, and multi-shift premiums
33. Page charges in
professional journals
34. Participant support costs
35. Patent
costs
36. Pension plans
37. Plant security costs
38. Pre-award
costs
39. Professional service costs
40. Profits and losses on disposition
of depreciable property or other capital assets
41. Publication and printing
costs
42. Rearrangement and alteration costs
43. Reconversion costs
44.
Recruiting costs
45. Relocation costs
46. Rental costs
47. Royalties
and other costs for use of patents and copyrights
48. Selling and marketing
49. Severance pay
50. Specialized service facilities
51. Taxes
52.
Termination costs
53. Training and education costs
54. Transportation
costs
55. Travel costs
56. Trustees
2. Revise and retitle paragraph 1 to read:
1. Advertising and public relations costs.
a. The term advertising costs means the costs of advertising media and
corollary administrative costs. Advertising media include magazines, newspapers,
radio and television programs, direct mail, exhibits, and the like.
b. The term public relations includes community relations and means those
activities dedicated to maintaining the image of the organization or maintaining
or promoting understanding and favorable relations with the community or public
at large or any segment of the public.
c. The only allowable advertising costs are those which are solely for:
(1) The recruitment of personnel required for the performance by the
organization of obligations arising under a sponsored award, when considered in
conjunction with all other recruitment costs, as set forth in paragraph 44
("Recruiting costs");
(2) The procurement of goods and services for the performance of a sponsored
award;
(3) The disposal of scrap or surplus materials acquired in the performance of
a sponsored award except when organizations are reimbursed for disposal costs at
a predetermined amount in accordance with OMB Circular A-110, Sec.___.34,
"Equipment"; or
(4) Other specific purposes necessary to meet the requirements of the
sponsored award.
d. The only allowable public relations costs are:
(1) Costs specifically required by sponsored awards;
(2) Costs of communicating with the public and press pertaining to specific
activities or accomplishments which result from performance of sponsored awards
(these costs are considered necessary as part of the outreach effort for the
sponsored awards); or
(3) Costs of conducting general liaison with news media and government public
relations officers, to the extent that such activities are limited to
communication and liaison necessary to keep the public informed on matters of
public concern, such as notices of contract/grant awards, financial matters,
etc.
e. Costs identified in subparagraphs c and d if incurred for more than one
sponsored award or for both sponsored work and other work of the organization,
are allowable to the extent that the principles in paragraphs B ("Direct Costs")
and C ("Indirect Costs") of Attachment A are observed.
f. Unallowable advertising and public relations costs include the following:
(1) All advertising and public relations costs other than as specified in
subparagraphs c, d, and e;
(2) Costs of meetings or other events related to fund raising or other
organizational activities including:
(i) Costs of displays, demonstrations, and exhibits;
(ii) Costs of meeting rooms, hospitality suites, and other special facilities
used in conjunction with shows and other special events; and
(iii) Salaries and wages of employees or cost of services engaged in setting
up and displaying exhibits, making demonstrations, and providing briefings;
(3) Costs of promotional items and memorabilia, including models, gifts, and
souvenirs;
(4) Costs of advertising and public relations designed solely to promote the
organization.
3. Renumber current paragraphs 2 through 8 as paragraphs 3 through 9,
respectively.
4. Add the following new paragraph 2:
2. Alcoholic beverages. Costs of alcoholic beverages are unallowable.
5. In paragraph 7 ("Compensation for personal services"), as renumbered above
in item 3, rename the current subparagraph g ("Pension costs"), as subparagraph
h. Add a new subparagraph g:
g. Organization-furnished automobiles. That portion of the cost of
organization-furnished automobiles that relates to personal use by employees
(including transportation to and from work) is unallowable as fringe benefit or
indirect costs regardless of whether the cost is reported as taxable income to
the employees. These costs are allowable as direct costs to sponsored award when
necessary for the performance of the sponsored award and approved by awarding
agencies.
6. Renumber current paragraphs 9 through 15 as paragraphs 11 through 17, respectively.
7. Add new paragraph 10:
10. Defense and prosecution of criminal and civil proceedings, claims,
appeals and patent infringement.
a. Definitions.
(1) Conviction, as used herein, means a judgment or a conviction of a
criminal offense by any court of competent jurisdiction, whether entered upon as
a verdict or a plea, including a conviction due to a plea of nolo
contendere.
(2) Costs include, but are not limited to, administrative and clerical
expenses; the cost of legal services, whether performed by in-house or private
counsel; and the costs of the services of accountants, consultants, or others
retained by the organization to assist it; costs of employees, officers and
trustees, and any similar costs incurred before, during, and after commencement
of a judicial or administrative proceeding that bears a direct relationship to
the proceedings.
(3) Fraud, as used herein, means (i) acts of fraud corruption or attempts to
defraud the Federal Government or to corrupt its agents, (ii) acts that
constitute a cause for debarment or suspension (as specified in agency
regulations), and (iii) acts which violate the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C.,
sections 3729-3731, or the Anti-Kickback Act, 41 U.S.C., sections 51 and 54.
(4) Penalty does not include restitution, reimbursement, or compensatory
damages.
(5) Proceeding includes an investigation.
b. (1) Except as otherwise described herein, costs incurred in connection
with any criminal, civil or administrative proceeding (including filing of a
false certification) commenced by the Federal Government, or a State, local or
foreign government, are not allowable if the proceeding: (1) relates to a
violation of, or failure to comply with, a Federal, State, local or foreign
statute or regulation by the organization (including its agents and employees),
and (2) results in any of the following dispositions:
(a) In a criminal proceeding, a conviction.
(b) In a civil or administrative proceeding involving an allegation of fraud
or similar misconduct, a determination of organizational liability.
(c) In the case of any civil or administrative proceeding, the imposition of
a monetary penalty.
(d) A final decision by an appropriate Federal official to debar or suspend
the organization, to rescind or void an award, or to terminate an award for
default by reason of a violation or failure to comply with a law or regulation.
(e) A disposition by consent or compromise, if the action could have resulted
in any of the dispositions described in (a), (b), (c) or (d).
(2) If more than one proceeding involves the same alleged misconduct, the
costs of all such proceedings shall be unallowable if any one of them results in
one of the dispositions shown in subparagraph b.(1).
c. If a proceeding referred to in subparagraph b is commenced by the Federal
Government and is resolved by consent or compromise pursuant to an agreement
entered into by the organization and the Federal Government, then the costs
incurred by the organization in connection with such proceedings that are
otherwise not allowable under subparagraph b may be allowed to the extent
specifically provided in such agreement.
d. If a proceeding referred to in subparagraph b is commenced by a State,
local or foreign government, the authorized Federal official may allow the costs
incurred by the organization for such proceedings, if such authorized official
determines that the costs were incurred as a result of (1) a specific term or
condition of a federally-sponsored award, or (2) specific written direction of
an authorized official of the sponsoring agency.
e. Costs incurred in connection with proceedings described in subparagraph b,
but which are not made unallowable by that subparagraph, may be allowed by the
Federal Government, but only to the extent that:
(1) The costs are reasonable in relation to the activities required to deal
with the proceeding and the underlying cause of action;
(2) Payment of the costs incurred, as allowable and allocable costs, is not
prohibited by any other provision(s) of the sponsored award;
(3) The costs are not otherwise recovered from the Federal Government or a
third party, either directly as a result of the proceeding or otherwise; and,
(4) The percentage of costs allowed does not exceed the percentage determined
by an authorized Federal official to be appropriate, considering the complexity
of the litigation, generally accepted principles governing the award of legal
fees in civil actions involving the United States as a party, and such other
factors as may be appropriate. Such percentage shall not exceed 80 percent.
However, if an agreement reached under subparagraph c has explicitly considered
this 80 percent limitation and permitted a higher percentage, then the full
amount of costs resulting from that agreement shall be allowable.
f. Costs incurred by the organization in connection with the defense of suits
brought by its employees or ex-employees under section 2 of the Major Fraud Act
of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-700), including the cost of all relief necessary to make
such employee whole, where the organization was found liable or settled, are
unallowable.
g. Costs of legal, accounting, and consultant services, and related costs,
incurred in connection with defense against Federal Government claims or
appeals, antitrust suits, or the prosecution of claims or appeals against the
Federal Government, are unallowable.
h. Costs of legal, accounting, and consultant services, and related costs,
incurred in connection with patent infringement litigation, are unallowable
unless otherwise provided for in the sponsored awards.
i. Costs which may be unallowable under this paragraph, including directly
associated costs, shall be segregated and accounted for by the organization
separately. During the pendency of any proceeding covered by subparagraphs b and
f, the Federal Government shall generally withhold payment of such costs.
However, if in the best interests of the Federal Government, the Federal
Government may provide for conditional payment upon provision of adequate
security, or other adequate assurance, and agreements by the organization to
repay all unallowable costs, plus interest, if the costs are subsequently
determined to be unallowable.
8. In paragraph 15 ("Equipment and other capital expenditures"), as
renumbered in item 6 above, replace subparagraphs 15.a.(1) and 15.b.(2) to read:
15.a.(1) "Equipment" means an article of nonexpendable, tangible personal
property having a useful life of more than one year and an acquisition cost
which equals or exceeds the lesser of (a) the capitalization level established
by the organization for the financial statement purposes, or (b) $5000. The
unamortized portion of any equipment written off as a result of a change in
capitalization levels may be recovered by continuing to claim the otherwise
allowable use allowances or depreciation on the equipment, or by amortizing the
amount to be written off over a period of years as negotiated with the Federal
cognizant agency.
15.b.(2) Capital expenditures for special purpose equipment are allowable as
direct costs, provided that items with a unit cost of $5000 or more have the
prior approval of awarding agency.
9. Renumber current paragraphs 16 through 36 as paragraphs 20 through 40,
respectively.
10. Add new paragraph 18:
18. Goods or services for personal use. Costs of goods or services for personal use of the organization's employees are unallowable regardless of whether the cost is reported as taxable income to the employees.
11. Add new paragraph 19:
19. Housing and personal living expenses.
a. Costs of housing (e.g., depreciation, maintenance, utilities, furnishings,
rent, etc.), housing allowances and personal living expenses for/of the
organization's officers are unallowable as fringe benefit or indirect costs
regardless of whether the cost is reported as taxable income to the employees.
These costs are allowable as direct costs to sponsored awards when necessary for
the performance of the sponsored award and approved by awarding agencies.
b. The term "officers" includes current and past officers and employees.
12. Add to paragraph 22.a.(2) ("Insurance and indemnification"), as renumbered in item 9, subparagraphs (f) and (g):
(f) Insurance against defects. Costs of insurance with respect to any costs
incurred to correct defects in the organization's materials or workmanship are
unallowable.
(g) Medical liability (malpractice) insurance. Medical liability insurance is
an allowable cost of Federal research programs only to the extent that the
Federal research programs involve human subjects or training of participants in
research techniques. Medical liability insurance costs shall be treated as a
direct cost and shall be assigned to individual projects based on the manner in
which the insurer allocates the risk to the population covered by the insurance.
13. Revise paragraph 30, as renumbered in item 9, to read:
30. Memberships, subscriptions and professional activity costs.
a. Costs of the organization's membership in business, technical, and
professional organizations are allowable.
b. Costs of the organization's subscriptions to business, professional, and
technical periodicals are allowable.
c. Costs of meetings and conferences, when the primary purpose is the
dissemination of technical information, are allowable. This includes costs of
meals, transportation, rental of facilities, and other items incidental to such
meetings or conferences.
d. Costs of membership in any civic or community organization are allowable
with prior approval by Federal cognizant agency.
e. Costs of membership in any country club or social or dining club or
organization are unallowable.
14. Delete subparagraph 39.d, as renumbered in item 9.
15. Delete current paragraph 37 ("Public service costs").
16. Renumber current paragraphs 38 through 44 as paragraphs 41 through 47,
respectively.
17. Revise paragraph 44, as renumbered in item 16, to read:
44. Recruiting costs.
a. Subject to subparagraphs b, c, and d, and provided that the size of the
staff recruited and maintained is in keeping with workload requirements, costs
of "help wanted" advertising, operating costs of an employment office necessary
to secure and maintain an adequate staff, costs of operating an aptitude and
educational testing program, travel costs of employees while engaged in
recruiting personnel, travel costs of applicants for interviews for prospective
employment, and relocation costs incurred incident to recruitment of new
employees, are allowable to the extent that such costs are incurred pursuant to
a well-managed recruitment program. Where the organization uses employment
agencies, costs that are not in excess of standard commercial rates for such
services are allowable.
b. In publications, costs of help wanted advertising that includes color,
includes advertising material for other than recruitment purposes, or is
excessive in size (taking into consideration recruitment purposes for which
intended and normal organizational practices in this respect), are unallowable.
c. Costs of help wanted advertising, special emoluments, fringe benefits, and
salary allowances incurred to attract professional personnel from other
organizations that do not meet the test of reasonableness or do not conform with
the established practices of the organization, are unallowable.
d. Where relocation costs incurred incident to recruitment of a new employee
have been allowed either as an allocable direct or indirect cost, and the newly
hired employee resigns for reasons within his control within twelve months after
being hired, the organization will be required to refund or credit such
relocation costs to the Federal Government.
18. Renumber current paragraphs 45 through 51 as paragraphs 49 through 55,
respectively.
19. Add new paragraph 48:
48. Selling and marketing. Costs of selling and marketing any products
or services of the organization (unless allowed under paragraph 1 as allowable
public relations costs) are unallowable. These costs, however, are allowable as
direct costs, with prior approval by awarding agencies, when they are necessary
for the performance of Federal programs.
20. Add new subparagraphs c, d and e to paragraph 49 ("Severance pay"), as
renumbered in item 18, as follow:
c. Costs incurred in certain severance pay packages (commonly known as "a
golden parachute" payment) which are in an amount in excess of the normal
severance pay paid by the organization to an employee upon termination of
employment and are paid to the employee contingent upon a change in management
control over, or ownership of, the organization's assets are unallowable.
d. Severance payments to foreign nationals employed by the organization
outside the United States, to the extent that the amount exceeds the customary
or prevailing practices for the organization in the United States are
unallowable, unless they are necessary for the performance of Federal programs
and approved by awarding agencies.
e. Severance payments to foreign nationals employed by the organization
outside the United States due to the termination of the foreign national as a
result of the closing of, or curtailment of activities by, the organization in
that country, are unallowable, unless they are necessary for the performance of
Federal programs and approved by awarding agencies.
21. Add new paragraph 56:
56. Trustees. Travel and subsistence costs of trustees (or directors) are allowable. The costs are subject to restrictions regarding lodging, subsistence and air travel costs provided in paragraph 55.
1. Delete the following organizations from Attachment C. These organizations
either no longer exist or are no longer exempted from complying with Circular
A-122.
2. Change Argonne Universities Association, Chicago, Illinois to Argonne
National Laboratory, Chicago, Illinois.
3. Change the location of the Institute for Defense Analysis in Virginia from Arlington to Alexandria.
4. Replace Midwest Research Institute, Headquartered in
Kansas City, Missouri to National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado.
D. A recompilation of the entire Circular A-122, with all its amendments,
follows:
TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTS
SUBJECT: Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations
1. Purpose. This Circular establishes principles for determining costs
of grants, contracts and other agreements with non-profit organizations. It does
not apply to colleges and universities which are covered by Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) Circular A-21, "Cost Principles for Educational Institutions";
State, local, and federally-recognized Indian tribal governments which are
covered by OMB Circular A-87, "Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian
Tribal Governments"; or hospitals. The principles are designed to provide that
the Federal Government bear its fair share of costs except where restricted or
prohibited by law. The principles do not attempt to prescribe the extent of cost
sharing or matching on grants, contracts, or other agreements. However, such
cost sharing or matching shall not be accomplished through arbitrary limitations
on individual cost elements by Federal agencies. Provision for profit or other
increment above cost is outside the scope of this Circular.
2. Supersession. This Circular supersedes cost principles issued by
individual agencies for non-profit organizations.
3. Applicability.
a. These principles shall be used by all Federal agencies in determining the costs of work performed by non-profit organizations under grants, cooperative agreements, cost reimbursement contracts, and other contracts in which costs are used in pricing, administration, or settlement. All of these instruments are hereafter referred to as awards. The principles do not apply to awards under which an organization is not required to account to the Federal Government for actual costs incurred.
b. All cost reimbursement subawards (subgrants, subcontracts, etc.) are
subject to those Federal cost principles applicable to the particular
organization concerned. Thus, if a subaward is to a non-profit organization,
this Circular shall apply; if a subaward is to a commercial organization, the
cost principles applicable to commercial concerns shall apply; if a subaward is
to a college or university, Circular A-21 shall apply; if a subaward is to a
State, local, or federally-recognized Indian tribal government, Circular A-87
shall apply.
4. Definitions.
a. Non-profit organization means any corporation, trust, association, cooperative, or other organization which:
(1) is operated primarily for scientific, educational, service, charitable, or similar purposes in the public interest;
(2) is not organized primarily for profit; and
(3) uses its net proceeds to maintain, improve, and/or expand its operations. For this purpose, the term "non-profit organization" excludes (i) colleges and universities; (ii) hospitals; (iii) State, local, and federally-recognized Indian tribal governments; and (iv) those non-profit organizations which are excluded from coverage of this Circular in accordance with paragraph 5.
b. Prior approval means securing the awarding agency's permission in
advance to incur cost for those items that are designated as requiring prior
approval by the Circular. Generally this permission will be in writing. Where an
item of cost requiring prior approval is specified in the budget of an award,
approval of the budget constitutes approval of that cost.
5. Exclusion of some non-profit organizations. Some non-profit
organizations, because of their size and nature of operations, can be considered
to be similar to commercial concerns for purpose of applicability of cost
principles. Such non-profit organizations shall operate under Federal cost
principles applicable to commercial concerns. A listing of these organizations
is contained in Attachment C. Other organizations may be added from time to
time.
6. Responsibilities. Agencies responsible for administering programs
that involve awards to non-profit organizations shall implement the provisions
of this Circular. Upon request, implementing instruction shall be furnished to
OMB. Agencies shall designate a liaison official to serve as the agency
representative on matters relating to the implementation of this Circular. The
name and title of such representative shall be furnished to OMB within 30 days
of the date of this Circular.
7. Attachments. The principles and related policy guides are set forth
in the following Attachments:
Attachment A - General Principles
Attachment B - Selected Items of Cost
Attachment C - Non-Profit Organizations Not Subject To This Circular
8. Requests for exceptions. OMB may grant exceptions to the
requirements of this Circular when permissible under existing law. However, in
the interest of achieving maximum uniformity, exceptions will be permitted only
in highly unusual circumstances.
9. Effective Date. The provisions of this Circular are effective
immediately. Implementation shall be phased in by incorporating the provisions
into new awards made after the start of the organization's next fiscal year. For
existing awards, the new principles may be applied if an organization and the
cognizant Federal agency agree. Earlier implementation, or a delay in
implementation of individual provisions, is also permitted by mutual agreement
between an organization and the cognizant Federal agency.
10. Inquiries. Further information concerning this Circular may be
obtained by contacting the Office of Federal Financial Management, OMB,
Washington, DC 20503, telephone (202) 395-3993.
Attachments
GENERAL PRINCIPLES
Table of Contents
A. Basic Considerations
1. Composition of total costs
2. Factors affecting allowability of
costs
3. Reasonable costs
4. Allocable costs
5. Applicable
credits
6. Advance understandings
7. Conditional exemptions
B. Direct Costs
C. Indirect Costs
D. Allocation of Indirect Costs and Determination of Indirect Cost Rates
1. General
2. Simplified allocation method
3. Multiple allocation base
method
4. Direct allocation method
5. Special indirect cost rates
E. Negotiation and Approval of Indirect Cost Rates
1. Definitions
2. Negotiation and approval of rates
GENERAL PRINCIPLES
A. Basic Considerations
1. Composition of total costs. The total cost of an award is
the sum of the allowable direct and allocable indirect costs less any applicable
credits.
2. Factors affecting allowability of costs. To be allowable
under an award, costs must meet the following general criteria:
a. Be reasonable for the performance of the award and be allocable thereto under these principles.
b. Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the award as to types or amount of cost items.
c. Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the organization.
d. Be accorded consistent treatment.
e. Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
f. Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period.
g. Be adequately documented.
3. Reasonable costs. A cost is reasonable if, in its nature
or amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person
under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur
the costs. The question of the reasonableness of specific costs must be
scrutinized with particular care in connection with organizations or separate
divisions thereof which receive the preponderance of their support from awards
made by Federal agencies. In determining the reasonableness of a given cost,
consideration shall be given to:
a. Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the organization or the performance of the award.
b. The restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as generally accepted sound business practices, arms length bargaining, Federal and State laws and regulations, and terms and conditions of the award.
c. Whether the individuals concerned acted with prudence in the circumstances, considering their responsibilities to the organization, its members, employees, and clients, the public at large, and the Federal Government.
d. Significant deviations from the established practices of the organization
which may unjustifiably increase the award costs.
4. Allocable costs.
a. A cost is allocable to a particular cost objective, such as a grant, contract, project, service, or other activity, in accordance with the relative benefits received. A cost is allocable to a Federal award if it is treated consistently with other costs incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances and if it:
(1) Is incurred specifically for the award.
(2) Benefits both the award and other work and can be distributed in reasonable proportion to the benefits received, or
(3) Is necessary to the overall operation of the organization, although a direct relationship to any particular cost objective cannot be shown.
b. Any cost allocable to a particular award or other cost objective under
these principles may not be shifted to other Federal awards to overcome funding
deficiencies, or to avoid restrictions imposed by law or by the terms of the
award.
5. Applicable credits.
a. The term applicable credits refers to those receipts, or reduction of expenditures which operate to offset or reduce expense items that are allocable to awards as direct or indirect costs. Typical examples of such transactions are: purchase discounts, rebates or allowances, recoveries or indemnities on losses, insurance refunds, and adjustments of overpayments or erroneous charges. To the extent that such credits accruing or received by the organization relate to allowable cost, they shall be credited to the Federal Government either as a cost reduction or cash refund, as appropriate.
b. In some instances, the amounts received from the Federal Government to
finance organizational activities or service operations should be treated as
applicable credits. Specifically, the concept of netting such credit items
against related expenditures should be applied by the organization in
determining the rates or amounts to be charged to Federal awards for services
rendered whenever the facilities or other resources used in providing such
services have been financed directly, in whole or in part, by Federal funds.
c. For rules covering program income (i.e., gross income earned from
federally-supported activities) see Sec. __.24 of Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) Circular A-110, "Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and
Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other
Non-Profit Organizations."
6. Advance understandings. Under any given award, the
reasonableness and allocability of certain items of costs may be difficult to
determine. This is particularly true in connection with organizations that
receive a preponderance of their support from Federal agencies. In order to
avoid subsequent disallowance or dispute based on unreasonableness or
nonallocability, it is often desirable to seek a written agreement with the
cognizant or awarding agency in advance of the incurrence of special or unusual
costs. The absence of an advance agreement on any element of cost will not, in
itself, affect the reasonableness or allocability of that element.
7. Conditional exemptions.
a. OMB authorizes conditional exemption from OMB administrative requirements
and cost principles circulars for certain Federal programs with
statutorily-authorized consolidated planning and consolidated administrative
funding, that are identified by a Federal agency and approved by the head of the
Executive department or establishment. A Federal agency shall consult with OMB
during its consideration of whether to grant such an exemption.
b. To promote efficiency in State and local program administration, when
Federal non-entitlement programs with common purposes have specific
statutorily-authorized consolidated planning and consolidated administrative
funding and where most of the State agency's resources come from non-Federal
sources, Federal agencies may exempt these covered State-administered,
non-entitlement grant programs from certain OMB grants management requirements.
The exemptions would be from all but the allocability of costs provisions of OMB
Circulars A-87 (Attachment A, subsection C.3), "Cost Principles for State,
Local, and Indian Tribal Governments," A-21 (Section C, subpart 4), "Cost
Principles for Educational Institutions," and A-122 (Attachment A, subsection
A.4), "Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations," and from all of the
administrative requirements provisions of OMB Circular A-110, "Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Non-Profit Organizations," and the
agencies' grants management common rule.
c. When a Federal agency provides this flexibility, as a prerequisite to a
State's exercising this option, a State must adopt its own written fiscal and
administrative requirements for expending and accounting for all funds, which
are consistent with the provisions of OMB Circular A-87, and extend such
policies to all subrecipients. These fiscal and administrative requirements must
be sufficiently specific to ensure that: funds are used in compliance with all
applicable Federal statutory and regulatory provisions, costs are reasonable and
necessary for operating these programs, and funds are not be used for general
expenses required to carry out other responsibilities of a State or its
subrecipients.
B. Direct Costs
1. Direct costs are those that can be identified specifically with a
particular final cost objective, i.e., a particular award, project, service, or
other direct activity of an organization. However, a cost may not be assigned to
an award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose, in
like circumstance, has been allocated to an award as an indirect cost. Costs
identified specifically with awards are direct costs of the awards and are to be
assigned directly thereto. Costs identified specifically with other final cost
objectives of the organization are direct costs of those cost objectives and are
not to be assigned to other awards directly or indirectly.
2. Any direct cost of a minor amount may be treated as an indirect cost for
reasons of practicality where the accounting treatment for such cost is
consistently applied to all final cost objectives.
3. The cost of certain activities are not allowable as charges to Federal
awards (see, for example, fundraising costs in paragraph 23 of
Attachment B). However, even though these costs are unallowable for
purposes of computing charges to Federal awards, they nonetheless must be
treated as direct costs for purposes of determining indirect cost rates and be
allocated their share of the organization's indirect costs if they represent
activities which (1) include the salaries of personnel, (2) occupy space, and
(3) benefit from the organization's indirect costs.
4. The costs of activities performed primarily as a service to members,
clients, or the general public when significant and necessary to the
organization's mission must be treated as direct costs whether or not allowable
and be allocated an equitable share of indirect costs. Some examples of these
types of activities include:
a. Maintenance of membership rolls, subscriptions, publications, and related functions.
b. Providing services and information to members, legislative or administrative bodies, or the public.
c. Promotion, lobbying, and other forms of public relations.
d. Meetings and conferences except those held to conduct the general administration of the organization.
e. Maintenance, protection, and investment of special funds not used in operation of the organization.
f. Administration of group benefits on behalf of members or clients,
including life and hospital insurance, annuity or retirement plans, financial
aid, etc.
C. Indirect Costs
1. Indirect costs are those that have been incurred for common or joint
objectives and cannot be readily identified with a particular final cost
objective. Direct cost of minor amounts may be treated as indirect costs under
the conditions described in subparagraph B.2. After direct
costs have been determined and assigned directly to awards or other work as
appropriate, indirect costs are those remaining to be allocated to benefiting
cost objectives. A cost may not be allocated to an award as an indirect cost if
any other cost incurred for the same purpose, in like circumstances, has been
assigned to an award as a direct cost.
2. Because of the diverse characteristics and accounting practices of
non-profit organizations, it is not possible to specify the types of cost which
may be classified as indirect cost in all situations. However, typical examples
of indirect cost for many non-profit organizations may include depreciation or
use allowances on buildings and equipment, the costs of operating and
maintaining facilities, and general administration and general expenses, such as
the salaries and expenses of executive officers, personnel administration, and
accounting.
3. Indirect costs shall be classified within two broad categories:
"Facilities" and "Administration." "Facilities" is defined as depreciation and
use allowances on buildings, equipment and capital improvement, interest on debt
associated with certain buildings, equipment and capital improvements, and
operations and maintenance expenses. "Administration" is defined as general
administration and general expenses such as the director's office, accounting,
personnel, library expenses and all other types of expenditures not listed
specifically under one of the subcategories of "Facilities" (including cross
allocations from other pools, where applicable). See indirect cost rate
reporting requirements in subparagraphs D.2.e and D.3.g.
D. Allocation of Indirect Costs and Determination of Indirect Cost
Rates
1. General.
a. Where a non-profit organization has only one major function, or where all its major functions benefit from its indirect costs to approximately the same degree, the allocation of indirect costs and the computation of an indirect cost rate may be accomplished through simplified allocation procedures, as described in subparagraph 2.
b. Where an organization has several major functions which benefit from its
indirect costs in varying degrees, allocation of indirect costs may require the
accumulation of such costs into separate cost groupings which then are allocated
individually to benefiting functions by means of a base which best measures the
relative degree of benefit. The indirect costs allocated to each function are
then distributed to individual awards and other activities included in that
function by means of an indirect cost rate(s).
c. The determination of what constitutes an organization's major functions will depend on its purpose in being; the types of services it renders to the public, its clients, and its members; and the amount of effort it devotes to such activities as fundraising, public information and membership activities.
d. Specific methods for allocating indirect costs and computing indirect cost
rates along with the conditions under which each method should be used are
described in subparagraphs 2 through 5.
e. The base period for the allocation of indirect costs is the period in
which such costs are incurred and accumulated for allocation to work performed
in that period. The base period normally should coincide with the organization's
fiscal year but, in any event, shall be so selected as to avoid inequities in
the allocation of the costs.
2. Simplified allocation method.
a. Where an organization's major functions benefit from its indirect costs to approximately the same degree, the allocation of indirect costs may be accomplished by (i) separating the organization's total costs for the base period as either direct or indirect, and (ii) dividing the total allowable indirect costs (net of applicable credits) by an equitable distribution base. The result of this process is an indirect cost rate which is used to distribute indirect costs to individual awards. The rate should be expressed as the percentage which the total amount of allowable indirect costs bears to the base selected. This method should also be used where an organization has only one major function encompassing a number of individual projects or activities, and may be used where the level of Federal awards to an organization is relatively small.
b. Both the direct costs and the indirect costs shall exclude capital expenditures and unallowable costs. However, unallowable costs which represent activities must be included in the direct costs under the conditions described in subparagraph B.3.
c. The distribution base may be total direct costs (excluding capital expenditures and other distorting items, such as major subcontracts or subgrants), direct salaries and wages, or other base which results in an equitable distribution. The distribution base shall generally exclude participant support costs as defined in paragraph 34 of Attachment B.
d. Except where a special rate(s) is required in accordance with
subparagraph 5, the indirect cost rate
developed under the above principles is applicable to all awards at the
organization. If a special rate(s) is required, appropriate modifications shall
be made in order to develop the special rate(s).
e. For an organization that receives more than $10 million in Federal funding
of direct costs in a fiscal year, a breakout of the indirect cost component into
two broad categories, Facilities and Administration as defined in
subparagraph C.3, is required. The rate in each case shall be
stated as the percentage which the amount of the particular indirect cost
category (i.e., Facilities or Administration) is of the distribution base
identified with that category.
3. Multiple allocation base method
a. General. Where an organization's indirect costs benefit its major
functions in varying degrees, indirect costs shall be accumulated into separate
cost groupings, as described in subparagraph b. Each grouping
shall then be allocated individually to benefitting functions by means of a base
which best measures the relative benefits. The default allocation bases by cost
pool are described in subparagraph c.
b. Identification of indirect costs. Cost groupings shall be established so
as to permit the allocation of each grouping on the basis of benefits provided
to the major functions. Each grouping shall constitute a pool of expenses that
are of like character in terms of functions they benefit and in terms of the
allocation base which best measures the relative benefits provided to each
function. The groupings are classified within the two broad categories:
"Facilities" and "Administration," as described in subparagraph
C.3. The indirect cost pools are defined as follows:
(1) Depreciation and use allowances. The expenses under this heading are the
portion of the costs of the organization's buildings, capital improvements to
land and buildings, and equipment which are computed in accordance with
paragraph 11 of Attachment B ("Depreciation and use
allowances").
(2) Interest. Interest on debt associated with certain buildings, equipment
and capital improvements are computed in accordance with paragraph 23 of
Attachment B ("Interest, fundraising, and investment management
costs").
(3) Operation and maintenance expenses. The expenses under this heading are
those that have been incurred for the administration, operation, maintenance,
preservation, and protection of the organization's physical plant. They include
expenses normally incurred for such items as: janitorial and utility services;
repairs and ordinary or normal alterations of buildings, furniture and
equipment; care of grounds; maintenance and operation of buildings and other
plant facilities; security; earthquake and disaster preparedness; environmental
safety; hazardous waste disposal; property, liability and other insurance
relating to property; space and capital leasing; facility planning and
management; and, central receiving. The operation and maintenance expenses
category shall also include its allocable share of fringe benefit costs,
depreciation and use allowances, and interest costs.
(4) General administration and general expenses. The expenses under this
heading are those that have been incurred for the overall general executive and
administrative offices of the organization and other expenses of a general
nature which do not relate solely to any major function of the organization.
This category shall also include its allocable share of fringe benefit costs,
operation and maintenance expense, depreciation and use allowances, and interest
costs. Examples of this category include central offices, such as the director's
office, the office of finance, business services, budget and planning,
personnel, safety and risk management, general counsel, management information
systems, and library costs.
In developing this cost pool, special care should be exercised to ensure that costs incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances are treated consistently as either direct or indirect costs. For example, salaries of technical staff, project supplies, project publication, telephone toll charges, computer costs, travel costs, and specialized services costs shall be treated as direct costs wherever identifiable to a particular program. The salaries and wages of administrative and pooled clerical staff should normally be treated as indirect costs. Direct charging of these costs may be appropriate where a major project or activity explicitly requires and budgets for administrative or clerical services and other individuals involved can be identified with the program or activity. Items such as office supplies, postage, local telephone costs, periodicals and memberships should normally be treated as indirect costs.
c. Allocation bases. Actual conditions shall be taken into account in
selecting the base to be used in allocating the expenses in each grouping to
benefitting functions. The essential consideration in selecting a method or a
base is that it is the one best suited for assigning the pool of costs to cost
objectives in accordance with benefits derived; a traceable cause and effect
relationship; or logic and reason, where neither the cause nor the effect of the
relationship is determinable. When an allocation can be made by assignment of a
cost grouping directly to the function benefited, the allocation shall be made
in that manner. When the expenses in a cost grouping are more general in nature,
the allocation shall be made through the use of a selected base which produces
results that are equitable to both the Federal Government and the organization.
The distribution shall be made in accordance with the bases described herein
unless it can be demonstrated that the use of a different base would result in a
more equitable allocation of the costs, or that a more readily available base
would not increase the costs charged to sponsored awards. The results of special
cost studies (such as an engineering utility study) shall not be used to
determine and allocate the indirect costs to sponsored awards.
(1) Depreciation and use allowances. Depreciation and use allowances expenses
shall be allocated in the following manner:
(a) Depreciation or use allowances on buildings used exclusively in the
conduct of a single function, and on capital improvements and equipment used in
such buildings, shall be assigned to that function.
(b) Depreciation or use allowances on buildings used for more than one
function, and on capital improvements and equipment used in such buildings,
shall be allocated to the individual functions performed in each building on the
basis of usable square feet of space, excluding common areas, such as hallways,
stairwells, and restrooms.
(c) Depreciation or use allowances on buildings, capital improvements and
equipment related space (e.g., individual rooms, and laboratories) used jointly
by more than one function (as determined by the users of the space) shall be
treated as follows. The cost of each jointly used unit of space shall be
allocated to the benefitting functions on the basis of:
(i) the employees and other users on a full-time equivalent (FTE) basis or
salaries and wages of those individual functions benefitting from the use of
that space; or
(ii) organization-wide employee FTEs or salaries and wages applicable to the
benefitting functions of the organization.
(d) Depreciation or use allowances on certain capital improvements to land,
such as paved parking areas, fences, sidewalks, and the like, not included in
the cost of buildings, shall be allocated to user categories on a FTE basis and
distributed to major functions in proportion to the salaries and wages of all
employees applicable to the functions.
(2) Interest. Interest costs shall be allocated in the same manner as the
depreciation or use allowances on the buildings, equipment and capital
equipments to which the interest relates.
(3) Operation and maintenance expenses. Operation and maintenance expenses
shall be allocated in the same manner as the depreciation and use allowances.
(4) General administration and general expenses. General administration and
general expenses shall be allocated to benefitting functions based on modified
total direct costs (MTDC), as described in subparagraph D.3.f.
The expenses included in this category could be grouped first according to major
functions of the organization to which they render services or provide benefits.
The aggregate expenses of each group shall then be allocated to benefitting
functions based on MTDC.
d. Order of distribution.
(1) Indirect cost categories consisting of depreciation and use allowances,
interest, operation and maintenance, and general administration and general
expenses shall be allocated in that order to the remaining indirect cost
categories as well as to the major functions of the organization. Other cost
categories could be allocated in the order determined to be most appropriate by
the organization. When cross allocation of costs is made as provided in
subparagraph (2), this order of allocation does not apply.
(2) Normally, an indirect cost category will be considered closed once it has
been allocated to other cost objectives, and costs shall not be subsequently
allocated to it. However, a cross allocation of costs between two or more
indirect costs categories could be used if such allocation will result in a more
equitable allocation of costs. If a cross allocation is used, an appropriate
modification to the composition of the indirect cost categories is required.
e. Application of indirect cost rate or rates. Except where a special
indirect cost rate(s) is required in accordance with subparagraph
D.5, the separate groupings of indirect costs allocated to each major
function shall be aggregated and treated as a common pool for that function. The
costs in the common pool shall then be distributed to individual awards included
in that function by use of a single indirect cost rate.
f. Distribution basis. Indirect costs shall be distributed to applicable
sponsored awards and other benefitting activities within each major function on
the basis of MTDC. MTDC consists of all salaries and wages, fringe benefits,
materials and supplies, services, travel, and subgrants and subcontracts up to
the first $25,000 of each subgrant or subcontract (regardless of the period
covered by the subgrant or subcontract). Equipment, capital expenditures,
charges for patient care, rental costs and the portion in excess of $25,000
shall be excluded from MTDC. Participant support costs shall generally be
excluded from MTDC. Other items may only be excluded when the Federal cost
cognizant agency determines that an exclusion is necessary to avoid a serious
inequity in the distribution of indirect costs.
g. Individual Rate Components. An indirect cost rate shall be determined for
each separate indirect cost pool developed. The rate in each case shall be
stated as the percentage which the amount of the particular indirect cost pool
is of the distribution base identified with that pool. Each indirect cost rate
negotiation or determination agreement shall include development of the rate for
each indirect cost pool as well as the overall indirect cost rate. The indirect
cost pools shall be classified within two broad categories: "Facilities" and
"Administration," as described in subparagraph C.3.
4. Direct allocation method.
a. Some non-profit organizations treat all costs as direct costs except
general administration and general expenses. These organizations generally
separate their costs into three basic categories: (i) General administration and
general expenses, (ii) fundraising, and (iii) other direct functions (including
projects performed under Federal awards). Joint costs, such as depreciation,
rental costs, operation and maintenance of facilities, telephone expenses, and
the like are prorated individually as direct costs to each category and to each
award or other activity using a base most appropriate to the particular cost
being prorated.
b. This method is acceptable, provided each joint cost is prorated using a base which accurately measures the benefits provided to each award or other activity. The bases must be established in accordance with reasonable criteria, and be supported by current data. This method is compatible with the Standards of Accounting and Financial Reporting for Voluntary Health and Welfare Organizations issued jointly by the National Health Council, Inc., the National Assembly of Voluntary Health and Social Welfare Organizations, and the United Way of America.
c. Under this method, indirect costs consist exclusively of general
administration and general expenses. In all other respects, the organization's
indirect cost rates shall be computed in the same manner as that described in
subparagraph 2.
5. Special indirect cost rates. In some instances, a single indirect
cost rate for all activities of an organization or for each major function of
the organization may not be appropriate, since it would not take into account
those different factors which may substantially affect the indirect costs
applicable to a particular segment of work. For this purpose, a particular
segment of work may be that performed under a single award or it may consist of
work under a group of awards performed in a common environment. These factors
may include the physical location of the work, the level of administrative
support required, the nature of the facilities or other resources employed, the
scientific disciplines or technical skills involved, the organizational
arrangements used, or any combination thereof. When a particular segment of work
is performed in an environment which appears to generate a significantly
different level of indirect costs, provisions should be made for a separate
indirect cost pool applicable to such work. The separate indirect cost pool
should be developed during the course of the regular allocation process, and the
separate indirect cost rate resulting therefrom should be used, provided it is
determined that (i) the rate differs significantly from that which would have
been obtained under subparagraphs 2, 3, and 4,
and (ii) the volume of work to which the rate would apply is material.
E. Negotiation and Approval of Indirect Cost Rates
1. Definitions. As used in this section, the following terms have the
meanings set forth below:
a. Cognizant agency means the Federal agency responsible for negotiating and approving indirect cost rates for a non-profit organization on behalf of all Federal agencies.
b. Predetermined rate means an indirect cost rate, applicable to a specified current or future period, usually the organization's fiscal year. The rate is based on an estimate of the costs to be incurred during the period. A predetermined rate is not subject to adjustment.
c. Fixed rate means an indirect cost rate which has the same characteristics as a predetermined rate, except that the difference between the estimated costs and the actual costs of the period covered by the rate is carried forward as an adjustment to the rate computation of a subsequent period.
d. Final rate means an indirect cost rate applicable to a specified past period which is based on the actual costs of the period. A final rate is not subject to adjustment.
e. Provisional rate or billing rate means a temporary indirect cost rate applicable to a specified period which is used for funding, interim reimbursement, and reporting indirect costs on awards pending the establishment of a final rate for the period.
f. Indirect cost proposal means the documentation prepared by an organization to substantiate its claim for the reimbursement of indirect costs. This proposal provides the basis for the review and negotiation leading to the establishment of an organization's indirect cost rate.
g. Cost objective means a function, organizational subdivision,
contract, grant, or other work unit for which cost data are desired and for
which provision is made to accumulate and measure the cost of processes,
projects, jobs and capitalized projects.
2. Negotiation and approval of rates.
a. Unless different arrangements are agreed to by the agencies concerned, the Federal agency with the largest dollar value of awards with an organization will be designated as the cognizant agency for the negotiation and approval of the indirect cost rates and, where necessary, other rates such as fringe benefit and computer charge-out rates. Once an agency is assigned cognizance for a particular non-profit organization, the assignment will not be changed unless there is a major long-term shift in the dollar volume of the Federal awards to the organization. All concerned Federal agencies shall be given the opportunity to participate in the negotiation process but, after a rate has been agreed upon, it will be accepted by all Federal agencies. When a Federal agency has reason to believe that special operating factors affecting its awards necessitate special indirect cost rates in accordance with subparagraph D.5, it will, prior to the time the rates are negotiated, notify the cognizant agency.
b. A non-profit organization which has not previously established an indirect cost rate with a Federal agency shall submit its initial indirect cost proposal immediately after the organization is advised that an award will be made and, in no event, later than three months after the effective date of the award.
c. Organizations that have previously established indirect cost rates must submit a new indirect cost proposal to the cognizant agency within six months after the close of each fiscal year.
d. A predetermined rate may be negotiated for use on awards where there is reasonable assurance, based on past experience and reliable projection of the organization's costs, that the rate is not likely to exceed a rate based on the organization's actual costs.
e. Fixed rates may be negotiated where predetermined rates are not considered
appropriate. A fixed rate, however, shall not be negotiated if (i) all or a
substantial portion of the organization's awards are expected to expire before
the carry-forward adjustment can be made; (ii) the mix of Federal and
non-Federal work at the organization is too erratic to permit an equitable
carry-forward adjustment; or (iii) the organization's operations fluctuate
significantly from year to year.
f. Provisional and final rates shall be negotiated where neither predetermined nor fixed rates are appropriate.
g. The results of each negotiation shall be formalized in a written agreement between the cognizant agency and the non-profit organization. The cognizant agency shall distribute copies of the agreement to all concerned Federal agencies.
h. If a dispute arises in a negotiation of an indirect cost rate between the cognizant agency and the non-profit organization, the dispute shall be resolved in accordance with the appeals procedures of the cognizant agency.
i. To the extent that problems are encountered among the Federal agencies in connection with the negotiation and approval process, OMB will lend assistance as required to resolve such problems in a timely manner.
SELECTED ITEMS OF COST
Table of Contents
1. Advertising and public relations costs
2. Alcoholic beverages
3. Bad
debts
4. Bid and proposal costs (reserved)
5. Bonding costs
6.
Communication costs
7. Compensation for personal services
8. Contingency
provisions
9. Contributions
10. Defense and prosecution of criminal and
civil proceedings, claims, appeals and patent infringement
11. Depreciation
and use allowances
12. Donations
13. Employee morale, health, and welfare
costs and credits
14. Entertainment costs
15. Equipment and other capital
expenditures
16. Fines and penalties
17. Fringe benefits
18. Goods or
services for personal use
19. Housing and personal living expenses
20.
Idle facilities and idle capacity
21. Independent research and development
(reserved)
22. Insurance and indemnification
23. Interest, fund raising,
and investment management costs
24. Labor relations costs
25.
Lobbying
26. Losses on other awards
27. Maintenance and repair
costs
28. Materials and supplies
29. Meetings and conferences
30.
Memberships, subscriptions, and professional activity costs
31. Organization
costs
32. Overtime, extra-pay shift, and multi-shift premiums
33. Page
charges in professional journals
34. Participant support costs
35. Patent
costs
36. Pension plans
37. Plant security costs
38. Pre-award
costs
39. Professional service costs
40. Profits and losses on disposition
of depreciable property or other capital assets
41. Publication and printing
costs
42. Rearrangement and alteration costs
43. Reconversion costs
44.
Recruiting costs
45. Relocation costs
46. Rental costs
47. Royalties
and other costs for use of patents and copyrights
48. Selling and marketing
49. Severance pay
50. Specialized service facilities
51. Taxes
52.
Termination costs
53. Training and education costs
54. Transportation
costs
55. Travel costs
56. Trustees
SELECTED ITEMS OF COST
Paragraphs 1 through 56 provide principles to be applied in
establishing the allowability of certain items of cost. These principles apply
whether a cost is treated as direct or indirect. Failure to mention a particular
item of cost is not intended to imply that it is unallowable; rather,
determination as to allowability in each case should be based on the treatment
or principles provided for similar or related items of cost.
1. Advertising and public relations costs.
a. The term advertising costs means the costs of advertising media and
corollary administrative costs. Advertising media include magazines, newspapers,
radio and television programs, direct mail, exhibits, and the like.
b. The term public relations includes community relations and means those
activities dedicated to maintaining the image of the organization or maintaining
or promoting understanding and favorable relations with the community or public
at large or any segment of the public.
c. The only allowable advertising costs are those which are solely for:
(1) The recruitment of personnel required for the performance by the
organization of obligations arising under a sponsored award, when considered in
conjunction with all other recruitment costs, as set forth in paragraph
44 ("Recruiting costs");
(2) The procurement of goods and services for the performance of a sponsored
award;
(3) The disposal of scrap or surplus materials acquired in the performance of
a sponsored award except when organizations are reimbursed for disposal costs at
a predetermined amount in accordance with OMB Circular A-110, Sec.___.34,
"Equipment"; or
(4) Other specific purposes necessary to meet the requirements of the
sponsored award.
d. The only allowable public relations costs are:
(1) Costs specifically required by sponsored awards;
(2) Costs of communicating with the public and press pertaining to specific
activities or accomplishments which result from performance of sponsored awards
(these costs are considered necessary as part of the outreach effort for the
sponsored awards); or
(3) Costs of conducting general liaison with news media and government public
relations officers, to the extent that such activities are limited to
communication and liaison necessary to keep the public informed on matters of
public concern, such as notices of contract/grant awards, financial matters,
etc.
e. Costs identified in subparagraphs c and d if incurred for
more than one sponsored award or for both sponsored work and other work of the
organization, are allowable to the extent that the principles in
paragraphs B ("Direct Costs") and C ("Indirect
Costs") of Attachment A are observed.
f. Unallowable advertising and public relations costs include the following:
(1) All advertising and public relations costs other than as specified in
subparagraphs c, d, and e;
(2) Costs of meetings or other events related to fund raising or other
organizational activities including:
(i) Costs of displays, demonstrations, and exhibits;
(ii) Costs of meeting rooms, hospitality suites, and other special facilities
used in conjunction with shows and other special events; and
(iii) Salaries and wages of employees or cost of services engaged in setting
up and displaying exhibits, making demonstrations, and providing briefings;
(3) Costs of promotional items and memorabilia, including models, gifts, and
souvenirs;
(4) Costs of advertising and public relations designed solely to promote the
organization.
2. Alcoholic beverages. Costs of alcoholic beverages are unallowable.
3. Bad debts. Bad debts, including losses (whether
actual or estimated) arising from uncollectible accounts and other claims,
related collection costs, and related legal costs, are unallowable.
4. Bid and proposal costs. (reserved)
5. Bonding costs.
a. Bonding costs arise when the Federal Government requires assurance against financial loss to itself or others by reason of the act or default of the organization. They arise also in instances where the organization requires similar assurance. Included are such bonds as bid, performance, payment, advance payment, infringement, and fidelity bonds.
b. Costs of bonding required pursuant to the terms of the award are allowable.
c. Costs of bonding required by the organization in the general conduct of
its operations are allowable to the extent that such bonding is in accordance
with sound business practice and the rates and premiums are reasonable under the
circumstances.
6. Communication costs. Costs incurred for telephone services, local
and long distance telephone calls, telegrams, radiograms, postage and the like
are allowable.
7. Compensation for personal services.
a. Definition. Compensation for personal services includes all compensation paid currently or accrued by the organization for services of employees rendered during the period of the award (except as otherwise provided in subparagraph h). It includes, but is not limited to, salaries, wages, director's and executive committee member's fees, incentive awards, fringe benefits, pension plan costs, allowances for off-site pay, incentive pay, location allowances, hardship pay, and cost of living differentials.
b. Allowability. Except as otherwise specifically provided in this paragraph, the costs of such compensation are allowable to the extent that:
(1) Total compensation to individual employees is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established policy of the organization consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; and
(2) Charges to awards whether treated as direct or indirect costs are determined and supported as required in this paragraph.
c. Reasonableness.
(1) When the organization is predominantly engaged in activities other than
those sponsored by the Federal Government, compensation for employees on
federally-sponsored work will be considered reasonable to the extent that it is
consistent with that paid for similar work in the organization's other
activities.
(2) When the organization is predominantly engaged in federally-sponsored activities and in cases where the kind of employees required for the Federal activities are not found in the organization's other activities, compensation for employees on federally-sponsored work will be considered reasonable to the extent that it is comparable to that paid for similar work in the labor markets in which the organization competes for the kind of employees involved.
d. Special considerations in determining allowability. Certain conditions require special consideration and possible limitations in determining costs under Federal awards where amounts or types of compensation appear unreasonable. Among such conditions are the following:
(1) Compensation to members of non-profit organizations, trustees, directors, associates, officers, or the immediate families thereof. Determination should be made that such compensation is reasonable for the actual personal services rendered rather than a distribution of earnings in excess of costs.
(2) Any change in an organization's compensation policy resulting in a substantial increase in the organization's level of compensation, particularly when it was concurrent with an increase in the ratio of Federal awards to other activities of the organization or any change in the treatment of allowability of specific types of compensation due to changes in Federal policy.
e. Unallowable costs. Costs which are unallowable under other paragraphs of this Attachment shall not be allowable under this paragraph solely on the basis that they constitute personal compensation.
f. Fringe benefits.
(1) Fringe benefits in the form of regular compensation paid to employees during periods of authorized absences from the job, such as vacation leave, sick leave, military leave, and the like, are allowable, provided such costs are absorbed by all organization activities in proportion to the relative amount of time or effort actually devoted to each.
(2) Fringe benefits in the form of employer contributions or expenses for social security, employee insurance, workmen's compensation insurance, pension plan costs (see subparagraph h), and the like, are allowable, provided such benefits are granted in accordance with established written organization policies. Such benefits whether treated as indirect costs or as direct costs, shall be distributed to particular awards and other activities in a manner consistent with the pattern of benefits accruing to the individuals or group of employees whose salaries and wages are chargeable to such awards and other activities.
(3) (a) Provisions for a reserve under a self-insurance program for unemployment compensation or workers' compensation are allowable to the extent that the provisions represent reasonable estimates of the liabilities for such compensation, and the types of coverage, extent of coverage, and rates and premiums would have been allowable had insurance been purchased to cover the risks. However, provisions for self-insured liabilities which do not become payable for more than one year after the provision is made shall not exceed the present value of the liability.
(b) Where an organization follows a consistent policy of expensing actual payments to, or on behalf of, employees or former employees for unemployment compensation or workers' compensation, such payments are allowable in the year of payment with the prior approval of the awarding agency, provided they are allocated to all activities of the organization.
(4) Costs of insurance on the lives of trustees, officers, or other employees
holding positions of similar responsibility are allowable only to the extent
that the insurance represents additional compensation. The costs of such
insurance when the organization is named as beneficiary are unallowable.
g. Organization-furnished automobiles. That portion
of the cost of organization-furnished automobiles that relates to personal use
by employees (including transportation to and from work) is unallowable as
fringe benefit or indirect costs regardless of whether the cost is reported as
taxable income to the employees. These costs are allowable as direct costs to
sponsored award when necessary for the performance of the sponsored award and
approved by awarding agencies.
h. Pension plan costs.
(1) Costs of the organization's pension plan which are incurred in accordance with the established policies of the organization are allowable, provided:
(a) Such policies meet the test of reasonableness;
(b) The methods of cost allocation are not discriminatory;
(c) The cost assigned to each fiscal year is determined in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), as prescribed in Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 8 issued by the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants; and
(d) The costs assigned to a given fiscal year are funded for all plan participants within six months after the end of that year. However, increases to normal and past service pension costs caused by a delay in funding the actuarial liability beyond 30 days after each quarter of the year to which such costs are assignable are unallowable.
(2) Pension plan termination insurance premiums paid pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974 (Pub. L. 93-406) are allowable. Late payment charges on such premiums are unallowable.
(3) Excise taxes on accumulated funding deficiencies and other penalties imposed under ERISA are unallowable.
i. Incentive compensation. Incentive compensation to employees based on cost reduction, or efficient performance, suggestion awards, safety awards, etc., are allowable to the extent that the overall compensation is determined to be reasonable and such costs are paid or accrued pursuant to an agreement entered into in good faith between the organization and the employees before the services were rendered, or pursuant to an established plan followed by the organization so consistently as to imply, in effect, an agreement to make such payment.
j. Overtime, extra-pay shift, and multi-shift premiums. See paragraph 32.
k. Severance pay. See paragraph 49.
l. Training and education costs. See paragraph 53.
m. Support of salaries and wages.
(1) Charges to awards for salaries and wages, whether treated as direct costs or indirect costs, will be based on documented payrolls approved by a responsible official(s) of the organization. The distribution of salaries and wages to awards must be supported by personnel activity reports, as prescribed in subparagraph (2), except when a substitute system has been approved in writing by the cognizant agency. (See subparagraph E.2 of Attachment A.)
(2) Reports reflecting the distribution of activity of each employee must be maintained for all staff members (professionals and nonprofessionals) whose compensation is charged, in whole or in part, directly to awards. In addition, in order to support the allocation of indirect costs, such reports must also be maintained for other employees whose work involves two or more functions or activities if a distribution of their compensation between such functions or activities is needed in the determination of the organization's indirect cost rate(s) (e.g., an employee engaged part-time in indirect cost activities and part-time in a direct function). Reports maintained by non-profit organizations to satisfy these requirements must meet the following standards:
(a) The reports must reflect an after-the-fact determination of the actual activity of each employee. Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) do not qualify as support for charges to awards.
(b) Each report must account for the total activity for which employees are compensated and which is required in fulfillment of their obligations to the organization.
(c) The reports must be signed by the individual employee, or by a responsible supervisory official having first hand knowledge of the activities performed by the employee, that the distribution of activity represents a reasonable estimate